电子词典增强下的词汇学习模式

电子词典增强下的词汇学习模式
作 者: 蔡晖
出版社: 知识产权出版社
丛编项:
版权说明: 本书为公共版权或经版权方授权,请支持正版图书
标 签: 词汇
ISBN 出版时间 包装 开本 页数 字数
未知 暂无 暂无 未知 0 暂无

作者简介

  蔡晖, 从事高等教育多年。英语专业博士研究生。撰写发表了十多篇文章。主要研究领域:英语教学、词汇教学、二语习得、元认知和学习自主等。CURRICULUM VITAEHui Cai was born on March 14th, 1975 in Weining, Guizhou Province of China. She received her Bachelor degree of Arts in English Linguistics and Literature from Foreign Languages Department, Guizhou University in 1997. In 2004, she obtained her Master of Arts degree in Linguistics and Literature from the College of International Studies, Guizhou University. Hui Cai has been teaching English in Guizhou Finance and Economics College since 1997. She is currently an associate professor of Guizhou Finance and Economics College, China. Her academic areas of interest include vocabulary teaching, metacognition and autonomy, etc.

内容简介

EFL学习者词汇匮乏是一个亟待解决的问题。为帮助外语学习者学习词汇,本书描述了作者博士论文的研究成果:设计一个电子词典增强下的词汇学习模式(EDEVOL Model)。该词汇学习模式旨在:(1)帮助学生学习目标词的词义;(2)帮助学生学习目标词的拼写形式。本研究表明EDEVOL Model可以作为帮助

图书目录

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION1

1.1 Statement of the problem1

1.2 Rationale of the study1

1.3 Research hypothesis9

1.4 Purposes of the study9

1.5 Research questions10

1.6 Significance of the study10

1.7 Definitions of terms12

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW14

2.1 Two basic constructs of vocabulary learning14

2.2 Variables40

2.3 Summary54

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY55

3.1 Research design55

3.2 Variables56

3.3 Participants57

3.4 Materials58

3.5 Instruments64

3.6 Procedures68

3.7 Data collection and scoring71

3.8 Data analysis72

3.9 Pilot Study 74

3.10 Experimental phases87

3.11 Summary88

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS 89

4.1 Results of the Vocabulary Pretest89

4.2 Answer to Research Question 193

4.3 Answer to Research Question 299

4.4 Answer to Research Question 3100

4.5 Answer to Research Question 4104

4.6 Answer to Research Question 5 105

4.7 Results of the T/F comprehension test108

4.8 Summary109

CHAPTER 5

THE E-DICTIONARY-BASED ENHANCERS

FOR VOCABULARY LEARNING MODEL110

5.1 Model elements110

5.2 Details of E-dictionary-Based Enhancers for Vocabulary

Learning Model 120

5.3 Summary122

CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND

LIMITATIONS123

6.1 Conclusions123

6.2 Implications and recommendations127

6.3 Limitations and suggestions for further research131

6.4 Summary 134

REFERENCES135

APPENDICES145

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS190

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1Task-induced involvement load (Laufer & Hustijn,2001,p.18)

21

Table 2.2A taxonomy of kinds of vocabulary learning strategies

(Nation, 2001, p.217)28

Table 2.3What is involved in knowing a word (Nation, 2001, p.27)30

Table 3.1Results of Word Test (part)62

Table 3.2Treatment for the target words and other possible

unknown words64

Table 3.3The methods of data analysis according to

the research questions72

Table 3.4Descriptive Statistics of the vocabulary tests80

Table 3.5Descriptive Statistics in while-reading tasks and

the T/F comprehension test81

Table 3.6Independent t-test results (N=38)82

Table 3.7Correlations between LUB and vocabulary gain and retention83

Table 3.8Descriptive statistics of the enhancers87

Table 4.1Pretest scores of all the subjects (N=90)90

Table 4.2Descriptive statistics of the two groups in the Vocabulary

Pretest93

Table 4.3Independent t-test results of the difference in the Vocabulary

Pretest93

Table 4.4Frequency description of scores in the VGRT (target words only) *

group crosstabulation94

Table 4.5Descriptive Statistics of the difference for target words between VGRT

and the Vocabulary Pretest (N=90)96

Table 4.6Independent t-test results of target words learning in VGRT

in terms of dictionary access (N=90)97

Table 4.7Descriptive statistics of the four vocabulary tests (N=45)100

Table 4.8Descriptive Statistics of the difference for other unknown words

between VGRT and the Vocabulary Pretest (N=90)101

Table 4.9Frequency of the difference for other unknown words between

VGRT and the Vocabulary Pretest * group crosstabulation Points102

Table 4.10Group Statistics of the difference for other unknown words

between VGRT and the Vocabulary Pretest 103

Table 4.11Independent t-test results of the difference for other unknown

words between VGRT and the Vocabulary Pretest104

Table 4.12Correlations between LUB and vocabulary gain and

retention104

Table 4.13Preferences of the vocabulary instruction program105

Table 4.14Independent t-test results of T/F comprehension test108

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1Conceptual framework of the EBEVOL Model6

Figure 3.1Procedures of the main study68

Figure 5.1A part of the Vocabulary Pretest111

Figure 5.2Text with the dictionary information114

Figure 5.3While-reading word relevance (a part)115

Figure 5.4The matching task116

Figure 5.5Vocabulary posttest 1 (VGPT)117

Figure 5.6Vocabulary posttest 2 (VGRT)118

Figure 5.7A part of the T/F comprehension test119

Figure 5.8E-dictionary-Based Enhancers for Vocabulary Learning

Model121

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CALL        Computer Assisted Language Learning

EBEVOL Model    E-dictionary-based Enhancers for Vocabulary Learning Model

EFL         English as a Foreign Language

FL Foreign language

L1 The first language

L2 The second language

LUB        Lookup behavior

RC Reading comprehension

TW         Target word

VGPT        Vocabulary Gain Productive Test

VGRT        Vocabulary Gain Receptive Test

VRPT        Vocabulary Retention Productive Test

VRRT        Vocabulary Retention Receptive Test

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS